The reader discusses the three possible arguments that consider the European silver coins, discovered in 1957 in the state of Maine in the United States. The professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the passage. And the professor says that there are many reasons believed that these coins are not fake but native.
First, the reader states that the far away distance where the coins founded, while the speaker casts doubt in this point by telling that there are a lot of objects found in a place far away from the area where the explorer inhabited, so there is reason interested to be discovered in region differ.
Second, the reader argues the no other coins found in the place where the explorer settled, the speaker encountered this by explaining that not necessary to do that because the explorers back up all coins with them and retained back with them to the same area of discovery.
Lastly, the reader says the useless of coins in Europe, conversely, the professor says that the explorer brings these coins because they are beautiful and attractive. And then the Native Americans want to gain these Silver coins, not as money but they are interested in having them as Jewelry.
- Genetic modifications of the trees. 71
- Tpo 25 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to us 63
- TPO 30 60
- TPO 34 67
Essay evaluation report
First, the reader states that the far away distance where the coins founded,
First, the reader states the far distance where the coins are founded,
so there is reason interested to be discovered in region differ.
so reasons interested to be discovered in regions differ.
the reader argues the no other coins found in the place where the explorer settled,
the reader argues that there are no other coins found in the place where the explorer are settled,
----------------------
flaws:
you have issues on grammar.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 12
No. of Words: 215 250
No. of Characters: 1022 1200
No. of Different Words: 115 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.829 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.753 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.28 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 66 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 45 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 33 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.155 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.46 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.753 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.183 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e interested in having them as Jewelry.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, lastly, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 215.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86976744186 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36836917006 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525581395349 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.8427404718 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.571428571 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7142857143 21.698381199 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298554044333 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132463650554 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527012400128 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174861017489 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316043857736 0.0443174109184 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.