The argument is able to convince people having different point of views can be considered as powerful. But the ability of the the argument cannot be judged solely on the basis of the convincing ability. Many times people are obdurate to get convinced by the explanation presented to them. I would like explain this in the following essay.
First and foremost, the religious views are inculcated in the person from the childhood time thus, making person understand some different views is very difficult. The religious views are based on beliefs and not on the facts. So, the reasoning does not sound logical to the person having his own religious thoughts. In such situations changing viewpoint of a person is nearly impossible and thus, does not depend upon whether the argument made is convincing or not.
Besides this, political views of the opposing party are also very difficult to change. The opposition party abolishes idea presented as they are supposed to do so. In such situations it very difficult to convince them and it generally ends up in arguments rather then having any discussion. Therefore, convincing the opposition party does not depend on the content of the argument but how cleverly the argument is represented to them.
Thus, if the argument is not able to convince the opposing group of people it does not mean that the argument is not convincing enough or poorly presented. Sometimes, the people are very adamant to understand other's point of view. Other times it is the way of representation of the argument which is important to convince some people.
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household. 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Reading is more educational than watching movies or TV. 66
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you ta 50
- "A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertisin 63
- Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts. Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...sidered as powerful. But the ability of the the argument cannot be judged solely on the...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...sidered as powerful. But the ability of the the argument cannot be judged solely on the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...t generally ends up in arguments rather then having any discussion. Therefore, convi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 2235.4752809 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 264.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01515151515 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72735690106 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496212121212 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 704.065955056 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1808263342 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.2666666667 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146434785862 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546173931582 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498419525957 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989556403635 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392899917944 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 100.480337079 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.