Contained in the line graph provided is data pertaining to the number of visitors went to and come from Britain by millions between 1979 and 1999, while the bar chart illustrates the most popular destinations that British people visited in 1999.
Overall, the trends of visits to and from Britain were upward during the given period, and there were 5 most common countries that attracted British people to visit.
With regard to the first graph, one sees a pattern of increase in the growth of number of visits. It is evident that the number of visits abroad by British residents rose gradually from just over 10 millions in 1979 to nearly 20 millions in 1984 and then climbed steadily to approximately 54 millions by the end of the period. There was a similar trend for number of visits to Britain as it grew moderately over the given period, jumping from precisely 10 millions in 1979 to about 35 millions in 1999. It is also worth noting that the number of British residents who went abroad exceeded the number of overseas residents who visited the UK by around 19 millions over the two decades.
Turing to the next chart, there were two groups of popular countries visited by the UK people, one contained nations that had more than 5 millions visits in 1999 and the other one included countries that showed lower 5 millions visits in the same year. Apparently, France and Spain belonged to the first group since there were around 9 millions British visitors went to Spain and well over 10 millions visited France, making it became the most attractive destination in 1999. Included in the second group were USA, Greece and Turkey where attracted only about 4 millions, 3.5 millions and 2.5 millions UK citizens, respectively.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You 67
- Percentage of Australian Men and Women doing Regular Physical Activity in 2010 73
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age They are from the United States in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
- World oil production 1960 2000 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, second, then, well, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 290.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86896551724 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46868617183 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479310344828 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8083079221 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.888888889 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2222222222 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358421430854 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155131354318 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946237638276 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237137259529 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648829103879 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.