Contained in the first bar chart provided is data pertaining to studying reasons of students by age, while the second one demonstrated the amount of employers' assistance. Overall, the reason for study changed dramatically when people get older and young people received more assistance from their employers than elders did.
Regarding the first bar chart, the two primary reasons for study were career and interest, which experienced patterns of downward and upward, respectively. It is clear that there was an overwhelming 80% of young students, who were under 26, chose career as their major reason for study. However, this figure then witnessed a steady decrease by more than 60% to nearly 20% when people were over 49. In contrary, despite the fact that only 10% of under 26 year olds students studied for their interest, this percentage rose remarkably to precisely 70% at the age range of over 49. It is also worth noting that students with the two different given reasons both achieved the same rate at 40% at the age range of 40-49.
Turning to the next chart, the trend in evidence was one of decrease. In the group of under 26, the proportion of students supported by their employers accounted for just over 60%. Nevertheless, the figure declined significantly to a bottom at about 30% in the group of 30-39 before a slight increase by 10% to approximately 40% at the age range of over 49.
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. (RE-WRITE 1) 76
- Bar chart: amount spent on consumer goods 67
- Percentage of Australian Men and Women doing Regular Physical Activity in 2010 73
- Some people find that following a strict routine allows them to feel more in control Others however think that constant changes to the routine make life more interesting and less predictable Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for you 39
- Share of total employment, Camba District, 1996-1999 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82845188285 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61389429962 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560669456067 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.75125897 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.4 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267387919871 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102644184377 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555079371158 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182832890222 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426286497351 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.