Teachers are so important for society because they form the future professionals who will develop the world in all the areas, besides, they bring in their hand a strong responsibility which is transmitting the knowledge. There are two ways of teaching something in class, by sending a group project or an individual project. As far as I am concerned, a student learns in a more effective way in a group because of each other's feedback and the sociability.
First of all, it is common knowledge that students in a group tend to come up with better ideas, also, working together everyone will acquire more knowledge from his peers. For instance, I was in a course with around ten more people about economics, the professor explained to us how to make money easily, and after that, he asked us to write down ideas about this and then share with the whole class. I could get valuable ideas for making money from my peers. This is how the group strategy in projects works incredibly.
Second, there are always some shy students who do not want to talk with anyone, from grouping them, professors will make them more sociable and go away from their shyness. For example, I met one of my best friend in a group discussion, being in a new class which you do not know anyone could be a really difficult situation, however, if the teacher group you, it is almost impossible that you do not meet someone. So, teachers from grouping students can make them build a strong relationship.
To sum up, for the reason aforementioned, I agree that teachers should assign students project which they will be working together. It, not only, will benefit them by giving them more friends, it also will give them more knowledge.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 85
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 88
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 80
- Soon technology will provide smart cars that virtually drives themselves. A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination. The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and other technologies that w 80
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 420, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ffective way in a group because of each others feedback and the sociability. First ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, really, second, so, then, as for, for example, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 299.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74247491639 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62309293543 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2621585627 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.166666667 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234769717159 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907204759251 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634174999959 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14372400652 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204023903623 0.0645574589148 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.