To understand the most important characteristic of a society, one must study a major cities.
From a general view, in the current state of affairs we observe, it is conspicuously clear that studying major cities in each society plays an important role in the profound characteristics of a society. Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concerns, people differ greatly on their attitudes towards this question that “can assessing major cities in each society help us to profound features of a society?” A host of people from one camp are in the conviction that answer to this question is “Yes”. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another camp embracing the view that evaluating major city cannot improve our knowledge about the society. Where I to choose between these options, I would take side with improving society knowledge by studying major cities. I think this way because of two the main reasons which will be discussed in the following essay. The first one which gives us a perspective of the history of the society is the monuments of each major cities and the second one is the knowledge of the economic power of the society which can obtain with studying major cities. Also, in support of this argument, we should note that in each society studying major cities is not a way of finding the most important characteristics of the society. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for our conclusion.
First of all, I strongly believe that studying major cities is one of the best formulae for discovering the history of a society. It can mirror the economic, historical and cultural features of the society form the past to now. Rome in Italy, Isfahan in Iran, Beijing in China and many other examples are existed to prove my claims.
Another reason which should not go unnoticed is the economic power of each main cities reflected us the best evidence about the economic power of the society. By and large, Major cities have the best economic centers in the societies. If economic centers can earn more money, it’s noted that the society has more powerful economic.
In order to fully evaluate this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional evidence before accepting or refusing it completely. The first piece of evidence we need to know more, then analyze, is the changing major cities in keeping pace with the time. In order to improve the argument as a whole, studying major cities which keep away to holding their ancient structure is not a perfect solution for evaluating the characteristics of the society. For example, Paris is a major city in France, but this city cannot help us to assess the main features of French society. This city has been modified to a modern city; consequently, traditional shreds of evidence is finding less now.
To put all into the nutshell, considering the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that it is more rational to how we can compensation of the features of a society with poring over main cities. I have several reasons for holding this view. In the final analysis, the writer’s recommendation cannot be taken to be true because, as it was shown in the body paragraphs above, it depends on a number of questions each of which should be answered. The recommendation can only be accepted if the mentioned statement already referred to are all implied appropriately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-29 | ali rouhani | 66 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | ali rouhani | 66 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | ali rouhani | 66 | view |
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea. 79
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing TaskIn an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling 3
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that recei 80
- TPO-31- Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to 73
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...al and cultural features of the society form the past to now. Rome in Italy, Isfahan...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, then, for example, i think, by and large, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2843.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 568.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00528169014 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85771869064 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452464788732 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 920.7 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1476989432 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.608695652 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6956521739 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223398435002 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692577822834 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869862486737 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112199517772 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087752937509 0.0667264976115 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.