To understand the most important characteristic of a society, one must study a major cities.
From a general view, in the current state of affairs we observe, it is conspicuously clear that studying major cities in each society plays an important role in the profound characteristics of a society. Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concerns, people differ greatly on their attitudes towards this question that “can assessing major cities in each society help us to profound features of a society?” A host of people from one camp are in the conviction that answer to this question is “Yes”. Their supposition is at odds with the conception of some others belonging to another camp embracing the view that evaluating major city cannot improve our knowledge about the society. Where I to choose between these options, I would take side with improving society knowledge by studying major cities. I think this way because of two the main reasons which will be discussed in the following essay. The first one which gives us a perspective of the history of the society is the monuments of each major cities and the second one is the knowledge of the economic power of the society which can obtain with studying major cities. Also, in support of this argument, we should note that in each society studying major cities is not a way of finding the most important characteristics of the society. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for our conclusion.
First of all, I strongly believe that studying major cities is one of the best formulae for discovering the history of a society. It can mirror the economic, historical and cultural features of the society form the past to now. For example, there are many cities which can prove my claims such as Rome in Italy, Isfahan in Iran, Beijing in China and many more examples.
Another reason which should not go unnoticed is the economic power of each main cities reflected us the best evidence about the economic power of the society. By and large, Major cities have the best economic centers in the societies. If these centers earn more money, it’s noted that the society has more powerful economic.
In order to fully evaluate this argument, we need to have a significant amount of additional evidence before accepting or refusing it completely. The first piece of evidence we need to know more, then analyze, is the changing major cities in keeping pace with the time. In order to improve the argument as a whole, studying major cities which keep away to holding their ancient structure is not a perfect solution for evaluating the characteristics of the society. For example, Paris is a major city in France, but this city cannot help us to assess the main features of French society. This city has been modified to a modern city; consequently, traditional shreds of evidence is finding less now.
To put all into the nutshell, considering the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that it is more rational to how we can compensation of the features of a society with poring over main cities. I have several reasons for holding this view. In the final analysis, the writer’s recommendation cannot be taken to be true because, as it was shown in the body paragraphs above, it depends on a number of questions each of which should be answered. The recommendation can only be accepted if the mentioned statement already referred to are all implied appropriately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-29 | ali rouhani | 66 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | ali rouhani | 66 | view |
| 2018-09-29 | ali rouhani | 66 | view |
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials. Companies that recei 80
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 71
- TPO-31- Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to 73
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their emplo 85
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...al and cultural features of the society form the past to now. For example, there are...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, then, for example, i think, such as, by and large, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2867.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 574.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99477351916 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84508002108 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447735191638 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 927.0 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7510092675 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.652173913 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9565217391 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21739130435 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218378290789 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692577822834 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869862486737 0.0758088955206 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108963605842 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873307421287 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.