By and large, there are certain considerations or factors which everyone can take into account to investigate and examine the test ways of an argument. The writer is of the view that the capability of the argument to convince someone with an opposing opinion is the best way to examine assertion. Because the only approach to explore the value of the idea is advocate that against conflicting angles. As far as I am concerned, I cannot agree with the claim as it is and I cannot with the reason either since both the claim and the reason are problematic. However, careful scrutiny of the evidence reveals that it provides little credible support for our conclusion.
The first salient aspect to be introduced is that the author states “the best test of an argument” phrase in the claim statement, while he or she doesn’t nominate any evidence to support its mentioned statement. I think other exhausted ways exist to examine an argument which may persuade detractors such as gain the person trust, back up reasoning with vivid examples and evidence and so on.
Another equally noteworthy point corroborating my stance is that the author implies that the only way to found out the value of the idea is defending that against opposing viewpoints. I strongly believe that each idea gets value in a different situation. Educational systems are the one example of rejecting this reason. I think that every country has scientists who are propounding several ideas for developing educational systems every year, but these ideas may don’t have any exhausted modification in other countries, even if defend that against opposing viewpoints. Therefore, the value of the ideas varies from place to place.
With respect to the reason, as mentioned in the introductive paragraph. I cannot agree with it because I think with compulsion nothing becomes worthwhile. I extremely believe that if the doubter and detractors accept the idea without any force the ideas become valuable. There are many examples to prove this manner in many of the countries which have a dictatorship government.
From what was already mentioned, considering the aforementioned points, I firmly believe that there are more rational claims and reasons to evaluate the test ways of an argument. As a matter of fact, some other reasons can be invoked to back up my perspective, but let us suffice to this.
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. Because dinosaurs wer 3
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their emplo 85
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n is the best way to examine assertion. Because the only approach to explore the value ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, as for, i think, such as, as a matter of fact, by and large, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08142493639 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86630350731 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52417302799 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7920873804 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.944444444 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399703478509 0.243740707755 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107233419847 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629461476561 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197330839104 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637284817853 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.