Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?

Essay topics:

Whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?

Submitted by pbdarab on Sat, 09/29/2018 - 10:15

Recently, the phenomenon of whether the design of the buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practice this in a particular field can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a general standpoint, the positive influence of the buildings on people’s mode can provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that the crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university researcher, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of a public arena, the negative effects of the buildings on people’s life and work might increase the consequences of vital needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the positive design of the buildings on daily living people and their work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-29 maninder1989 77 view
2019-10-10 jashan randhawa 55 view
2019-10-10 jashan randhawa 55 view
2019-08-24 kcowz1110 88 view
2019-08-10 sajid.uett 65 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... impact on people's life and work? and its corresponding impacts have sparked ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59786476868 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25521832554 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615658362989 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4346153689 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.083333333 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393071135199 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141095675971 0.0925447433944 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.234853687768 0.071462118173 329% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213822484716 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141598169667 0.0609392437508 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.