Recently, the positive and negative impacts and the associated consequences of building designs have sparked heated debate within the realm of the public areana. The advantages of advanced building design, as well as the consequently positive correlation between such critical matter and productivity, are contested by many individuals, yet there are others arguing that the society may be paying unnecessary costs in this regard. I am inclined to support that building designs do bring significant impacts to the community, and I am going to illustrative my arguments in this essay.
First and foremost, well designed buildings are important to human kind’s happiness from many different perspectives, including daily life, work, social interactions, leisure and health. No one could decline the intensive interactions between people and buildings that happen so naturally and inevitably on a daily basis. As a tangilble experience, some research by well known university asserted the positive correlation between the level of satsifaction and building design. That said, one can presume the preconceived notion of this unique phenomenom.
On the contrary, the opponents of the above viewpoints may state that overdevelopemnt of buildings may bring irreversible damage to human life and almost deadful, that public should pay extra attention on this subject matter. Based on my own experience, living and working in a poorly designed building might create positive impact to me in terms of creating motivation for work.
In conclusion, while there are compelling arguments for both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits brought to the public by the compreshensive design of building far outweight the relevant drawbacks. Not only do the advantages prove the significance of total comes, but also pinpointing throny issues’ potential implications.
- Parents should be legally responsible for children's act/behavior. What is your opinion? 75
- University experience is more important than a university degree. Some people argue that university life is much more important than an educational degree in job market, do you agree or not agree? 77
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 11
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 55
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of differential education, i.e. splitting students into different classesaccording to their academic performance. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 585, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llustrative my arguments in this essay. First and foremost, well designed buildi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ant to human kind's happiness from many different perspectives, including daily life, wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m many different perspectives, including daily life, work, social interactions, l...
^^
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eived notion of this unique phenomenom. On the contrary, the opponents of the ab...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... terms of creating motivation for work. In conclusion, while there are compellin...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny issues' potential implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70357142857 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15175485618 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617857142857 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.498142548 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.181818182 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348920957891 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116155687419 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795633963083 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184666534113 0.151781067708 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060729339216 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.