The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the table illustrating data related to the underground railway systems in six cities.
At first glance, in terms of size, London system ranks first being 394km, to be more specific, as twice large as the second biggest system situated in Paris, which is 199km. Those systems are followed by the subway systems of Tokyo, Washington DC, Los Angeles and Kyoto, who have relatively 155, 126, 28 and 11km of routes. When it comes to the number of annual passengers, London, Paris and Tokyo systems are significantly ahead of the systems in Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles. (Accordingly 775mln, 1191mln and 1927mln clients vs. 144mln, 45mln and 50mln clients).
It is also visible that, the oldest underground railway system belongs to London (1863), while the youngest one is located on Los Angeles (2001). At that point, Paris (1900), Tokyo (1927), Washington (1976) and Kyoto (1981) systems hold middle positions.
To sum it up, taking all the information into account, it can be concluded that, older subway systems are both larger and busier in comparison with the younger ones.
- The table below shows the consumer durables owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983. 83
- Happiness is considered very important in life. Why is it difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness? 70
- The tables and pie chart show in percentage terms of the results of a survey of a new shopping complex in Auckland New Zealand 74
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a frog Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 55
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 180 200
No. of Characters: 864 1000
No. of Different Words: 113 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.663 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.8 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.414 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 18 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.69 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.375 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.418 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.692 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4