People say that the “A students” are working for the “B students” and the “C students” run the companies. Perhaps this is an extremism, but I think that there is some truth in this adage. Today’s world is much different from what it used to be and I think that in the present is much more valuable to relate well with other people than being a hard-working student.
First, networking nowadays is crucial in order to land a good job. It is not hard to see top students without jobs in the current time, this is because many of them do not have the skills to know new people that could give them a job. Moreover, students today are so competitive that companies are not able to tell apart a good worker from their resume-they all have the same achievements-. It is from my experience that knowing the right people is crucial to have a good job, for instance, when I finished high-school no company would give me a job because I had no resume. However, a friend’s dad gave me a job in their company and I was able to pay for my university studies.
Furthermore, today’s world requires teamwork in order to solve problems rather than an individual. It does not matter what field we are talking about, it can be science or industries, people have to work in groups. For example, on research, we can see a large list of names on a paper, or in Google, a team is assigned to work on a given problem. For the sake of communicating and working well with a group of people, good relationships are crucial, so it is not hard to conclude that the people with good social skills are going to be the most successful.
In conclusion, personally, I think it is increasingly more important to develop social skills in the current market. Accordingly, the prospective worker is better prepared if it posses a good network and works well within a team. So I think the importance of grades is diminishing more and more in actuality.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 78
- 41)Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 76
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 80
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 80
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6446991404 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91888067055 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507163323782 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7656718331 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.066666667 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167540717834 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573975764841 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041515399398 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993948081143 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00405742941207 0.0645574589148 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.