The reading article and lecture talks about buzzing- an advertisement technique to hire ordinary people to promote products. The passage points out three disadvantages of buzzing. The speaker who works as a buzzer, contested all the claims presented in the text.
First, the reading avers that, consumers should know that the buzzers are getting paid to praise the products. Sometimes paid advertisement may spread incorrect information. The guest lecturer refutes this claim and points out that, buzzers are ordinary people and are not like paid actors. Even though they get benefited to promote the products; buzzers tell their own personal experiences when they use the actual products. They will promote the products only if the product is true to its promise. They tell their true experiences.
Next, the text argues that, buzzers do not reveal their identity as paid advertisers and unknowingly consumers get lobbied and it can be harmful to consumers. However, the speaker refutes the argument and states that, people ask lot of questions about products and if buzzers do not give satisfactory information then people will not buy the products. So consumers do not take buzzers words blindly and but products.
Lastly, the article posits that, buzzing will harm social relationships and people will lose trust in general. The speaker, ridicules the assumption that the buzzing will harm civilization. He further adds that, buzzers will promote only genuine products and people will get a good experience and that will promote more trust and people will be open to more people.
In conclusion, the speaker rejects all the claims presented in the reading and stresses that the claims are misleading and give wrong impression about buzzing.
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 81
- TPO-29 - Integrated Writing Task Large numbers of dinosaur fossils have been discovered in deposits on Alaska's North Slope, a region that today experiences an extremely cold,arctic climate. One hundred million years ago, when those dinosaurs were alive, 81
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 85
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 83
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nts out three disadvantages of buzzing. The speaker who works as a buzzer, conteste...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, may, so, then, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3273381295 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64835427061 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514388489209 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3971622874 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5625 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370167283872 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121772929388 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465719762545 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183776683873 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909006383614 0.0443174109184 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.