The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor other think it has an opposite effect
Some people believe that the range of technology is increasing the gap between the wealthy and the poor but others think that it is causing an opposite effect.
In my opinion, nowadays, advancements in technology often cause the high cost of gadgets day by day, so people in the undeveloped or developing countries have no afford to own them. Because some gadgets are more expensive than their monthly income and citizens wear many hats in their life. If they try to buy and use high technology, they won’t be enough to pay for others which is more necessary. Especially, after using they can be addicted by the other technology or these users have to upgrade their gadgets to suit to new system which manufactures required. Therefore, a growing number of people believe that the poor will become poorer, the rich almost have enough money to use the high technologies. In addition, they will have a lot of chances to approach innovations and broaden their knowledge easily. After they are possible to create new technologies for business, the rich sale their technological products to generate their higher profit.
However, it is not totally to say that the development of technology can lead to rise the gap between the rich and the poor. In fact, at the moment, not only the wealth but also the poor are also accessible high gadgets, which are affordable and mass-production. The business need to expand their market to compete each other so they must produce for many classes in society. For example, now the Apple branch focus to sale their product to the wealth and the others concentrate in lower classes with cheaper price. Besides, the internet is available to almost sections with Wi-Fi hotpot which is free to employ certain places such as buses, libraries and airports for searching.
In conclusion, the technology brings to us is undeniable. But humans should be taught how utilize functions of internet correctly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-02 | khoipham305 | 80 | view |
- THE BEST WAY TO RESOLVE THE INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS IS TO INCREASE THE COST OF FUEL 78
- THE BEST WAY TO RESOLVE THE INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS IS TO INCREASE THE COST OF FUEL 78
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 80
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor other think it has an opposite effect 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92048929664 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64104771487 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565749235474 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2077634832 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.266666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274982925254 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954552461365 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166039906678 0.0667982634062 249% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235601777574 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.252197198397 0.056905535591 443% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.