some people believe that robots will play an important role in future society, while others argue that robots maight have negative effect on society
discuss both view and give your opinion
These days, people have different views about how robots would effect on society in future. While, a group believe robots could play a great role, we would like to consider some crucial reasons to prove that they could make some problems for societies.
It is impossible to deny an effective presence of robots in some hard jobs like working in difficult condition such as metal industries beside furnaces, occupying in dangerous job such as nuclear power stations, to name a few. Proponents of using these new technologies believe that they could employ in different conditions either works or homes. I remember that I watched some movies about future life which shown family members, friends, nannies even pets will be replaced by robots. The creators fantasize how life could be easy and comfortable if everything is going robotic.
On the other hand, we have different opinions. You could imagine world how would be soulless with being robots everywhere while we could use them just in some situations that are harmful for humankind. Although, they could be more sensible and accurate, replacement of them will strongly increase unemployment phenomenon. Meanwhile, governments during these years have been trying to organize different plans to solve this problem. It seems to me, human might be disappointed by themselves by allowing robots to come to their life.
In conclusion, using robots in future might be helpful, if their roles manage to limit in such a vital and difficult areas where man could be damaged. I mean, robots must be used in human services not substituted for them.
- the graph below show the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projection for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 67
- The graph shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 67
- Competitiveness is considered to be a positive quality among people How does competitiveness affect individuals Is competitiveness a positive or negative qualities 88
- The three pie charts below show the change in the annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981. 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... different views about how robots would effect on society in future. While, a group be...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...bout how robots would effect on society in future. While, a group believe robots could pl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...man services not substituted for them.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, i mean, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16475095785 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63266627669 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0334730127 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.692307692 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213713614906 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777194841149 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548669261765 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145146913858 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664119379224 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.