A monetary aid is given to old people by authorities to support their living in this period of their life. Some people believe that this kind of support is not acceptable as one should be prepared for this moment by allocating some savings before retirement. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this view due to the slight increase in pensions with time compared to living expenses and the difficulty to compete with youngsters in the job market.
Firstly, When workers reach the retirement age, they often receive a pension which is comparatively inferior to the original salary they used to earn. Therefore, their expenditure should be minimized to adapt to the new financial situation. However, the normal trend is that prices gradually rise and for this reason, they do need to receive financial aid.
Another point to consider is the relentless competition and restrictions in the job market in case they think of being recruited once again. for instance, in some workplaces, low salaries are given to their own old workers when they get hired after pension and in other places, they aren't even allowed to. This adds more obstacles in the way of elderly people to sustain their living standards and consequently requires the governments to support old people's living.
Finally, aged people should not be forgotten after retirement, as the taxes were monthly deducted from their salaries, which were spent for the benefit of the whole country. This means that a certain budget should be dedicated by the government to care for the old people as a way of honoring them for their commitment to achieving the welfare of their country.
In conclusion, owing to the rising living expenses, useful contribution to the country's welfare and the challenging competition in the job market, elderly people should be funded by the government, and by doing so we also give a message to the young generations that they will be honored when they got old, after their long work service for their country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ey think of being recruited once again. for instance, in some workplaces, low salar...
^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...after pension and in other places, they arent even allowed to. This adds more obstacl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02994011976 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66692362537 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541916167665 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6155296091 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241351430107 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976577879832 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059286387265 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140941501545 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535412482776 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.