A life fully depends on the relationship between people. No one could live without any communication and interaction which drives into a controversial question. Some people believe that keep a few best friends throughout your life is better. Nevertheless, others think to make many new friends will help to live happily. From my point of view, even though how valuable your old friends are, it is always better to meet and make friends with new people. I will explore the reasons in the following essay.
Above all, the ability to making many new friends encourage improving the facility to relate well with people. Also, the ability to interact with people well will lead a person to success. The prosperous person surrounded by many people which gives him or her no chance to avoid making friends. Furthermore, it will encourage your ability to understand everyone you meet because you are familiar with many unusual behaviors. For instance, if a person has a weak-minded friend, he or she already knows how to talk or how to sustain this kind of people. Also, because a person has many friends, they will get advice on one problem from many different angles. I think it will help the person to make a right choice in a crucial situation.
Another reason is, the ability to make many new friends will open a new world for people. Because everyone has their own unique personality and perspective which makes them an individual. Moreover, the world of everyone will encourage the person to have a comprehension of everything. From my personal experience, when I go to an event or a club, I prefer to make friends as many as possible. As a result, I have friends who work and studies in different fields which helps me to get an understanding of a broad range of knowledge in every subject.
All in all, the pros of the ability to making new friends outweigh the cons. Moreover, I think leaving your old friends is not the same as making many new.
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 76
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 60
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 80
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...hey will get advice on one problem from many different angles. I think it will help the person...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, i think, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75588235294 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67584834396 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508823529412 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4555985983 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.85 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231977034548 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819126116919 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673996050863 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159458073305 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367088144819 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.