The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart indicates various particular university subjects which were selected to study by undergraduates in the year 2005.
Overall, it is obvious that sciences and math were the most popular subjects with male students. By contrast, non-sciences subjects, namely social sciences and languages were the most common subjects with female students.
The number of male students choosing sciences and math to study was the highest, at over 20 thousand and about 18 thousand students, while those subjects chosen by only nearly 10 and 5 thousand female students respectively. However, female students choosing social sciences, languages and arts accounted for the highest figures, at around 20 thousand,18 thousand and 10 thousand students respectively.
More male students than female students chose literature to study, 15 thousand compared to above 10 thousand students. In addition, law selected by the number of male students was a half higher than the figure for female students, 10 thousand compared to 5 thousand students. Both male and female students had the similar figure for selecting humanities to study, at over 10 thousand students.
- Percentage of car ownership in Great Britain according to household 84
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 81
- People aim to achieve the balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the problems if people try to achieve this balance How to overcome these problems 65
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three different cities Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51685393258 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79883558308 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2361085886 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.75 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124528800083 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735783332823 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515889392742 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968070033931 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626058544339 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.