The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.
The pie illustrates the percentage of four different types of transport, while the table shows the causes why people drive the car in Edmonton.
From the general perspective, it can be observed from the pie chart that the car has the highest percentage of use in public transport. Meanwhile, in the table, most people regularly use the car to go to work.
It is evident from the information provided in the pie that the car and the light rail transit make up the biggest percentage of use in transport, in which the car's percentage at 45% and the light rail transit's proportion at over a third of the use of public transport. In contrast, fewer people use the bus and taxi for public transport, both kinds of transport are recorded at 10%.
Moreover, over a haft of the proportion of people using the car to commute to work, the highest percentage, followed by business and taking children to school at 45% and 40% respectively. On the other hand, the shopping and leisure activities are both reported at 10% in the percentage of use in public transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- All parents want the best opportunities for their children There are some people who think that schools should teach children skills but others think having a range of subjects is better for a children s future 83
- Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, third, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72043010753 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7493679573 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2156441559 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293209033168 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145730231652 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412446244461 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185418887579 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448814352575 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.