Question: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is a very significant argue about to use which sources while doing a research. Most of the researchers prefer to use printed materials such as books and articles. However, in my opinion, internet is more useful than the printed materials from so many perspectives. We will discuss about it in the following statements.
First of all, to find the whatever a researcher wants is simpler in internet than the printed materials. You can write the key words on the research engine and after a few clicks you will be found so many sources. Additionally, you can check the reliability of the sources as well by researching it by using internet. However, you may not able to do that by using a just printed materials. If that book is written by using plagiarism, how can you aware of it? You need to check the other books as well. This is a very common problem in Turkey. So, this situation makes internet more reliable and useful than printed materials.
Secondly, the printed materials have huge costs to read them. To print them on a paper we need to cut so many trees. Obviously, the source of the paper is forests. To increase the printed materials life amount, the paper must be made by using qualified paper. Besides that, to make these printed books more reachable the amount should be increased. All these means using more trees. Despite all this work, the fee of the printed books is still so expensive for researchers, Turkey can be an instance for that. Because of this reason, researchers want to use internet for their researches, not expensive, not damageable for the nature and world. This is another reason to use internet instead of printed materials.
Another important issue is if you want to contact with author you can do that easily by using internet, you can find the communication address or a discussion web page about a book or article, so a researcher can read the article and discuss it with other readers or writer as well. One of the famous Economics writer Mahfi Egilmez’s blog can be an example for that.
Finally, even though there are still some researchers claim using printed materials are better than internet-based ones. Because of the accessibility, reliability and the fee issue internet-based materials are more common for the researchers. This can be called as natural selection. At the end, using internet is better than the printed materials for researchers.
- Do you agree or disagree?your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does. 66
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Summarize the main points made in the lecture that you just heard, discussing how they cast doubt on points made in the reading. You can refer to the reading passage as you write. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... about to use which sources while doing a research. Most of the researchers prefer to use ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: KEY_WORDS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keywords'?
Suggestion: keywords
...he printed materials. You can write the key words on the research engine and after a few ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'material'?
Suggestion: material
...able to do that by using a just printed materials. If that book is written by using plagi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able and useful than printed materials. Secondly, the printed materials have hug...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'materials'' or 'material's'?
Suggestion: materials'; material's
...per is forests. To increase the printed materials life amount, the paper must be made by ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apos;s blog can be an example for that. Finally, even though there are still som...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89051094891 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78129967768 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467153284672 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2275813952 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.4444444444 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2222222222 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.48148148148 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40905117752 0.236089414692 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128657606419 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942202536558 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26233333443 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631800248496 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.