A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
The author claims that the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation. his statement does not honest because pet food sample tested by company, and company don't want lose its value, so food-officer should test the food-sample. I strongly defy with the claim and find it illogical due to the below mentioned reasons:
First argument of author is, pet food recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints. It is burden amount of food was recalled because of complaints. So complaints came from several area, and it is say that in several area pets who consumed the food they are start vomiting, lethargy, and so on. If complaints came from one particular area then we say it not mistake by company, Because pets illness can also happened by pets drinking their area water or whether of area. But complaints receive from manifold area, so it say company error.
Second argument of author is, after the recall pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and ensure that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved. In this statement company has check only the indigent chemicals of pet-food not the dose of chemicals. Because chemical overdose it is harmful for pets.
In the whole, The author argument is flaws as per mine reasons mentioned above. Company can not says recalled food was not responsible for pets symptoms, in order to that their food is not answerable they should test dose of chemicals or amount, and also company should give to food-officer to check their food and verify.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | cr.sumiran | 51 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 23
- Argument: One increasingly popular policy for promoting renewable energy is a feed-in tariff. Under such a policy, investors on any scale, from large corporations to individual homeowners, produce their own energy from solar panels installed on their prop 37
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have 18
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 33
Comments
Essay evaluation report
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/pet-food-company-r…
----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 276 350
No. of Characters: 1316 1500
No. of Different Words: 133 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.076 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.768 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.477 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 94 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 24 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.708 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.414 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.608 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.136 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: His
...further resources to the investigation. his statement does not honest because pet f...
^^^
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d sample tested by company, and company dont want lose its value, so food-officer sh...
^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun area seems to be countable; consider using: 'several areas'.
Suggestion: several areas
... of complaints. So complaints came from several area, and it is say that in several area pet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mistakes'?
Suggestion: mistakes
... one particular area then we say it not mistake by company, Because pets illness can al...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saith', 'says'?
Suggestion: saith; says
...aints receive from manifold area, so it say company error. Second argument of au...
^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'say'
Suggestion: say
...easons mentioned above. Company can not says recalled food was not responsible for p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 11.1786427146 98% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 2260.96107784 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 275.0 441.139720559 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93090909091 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54918168688 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 204.123752495 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 705.55239521 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.67365269461 358% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5320425066 57.8364921388 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 119.503703932 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.70786347227 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.20758483034 24% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.88822355289 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.558686934429 0.218282227539 256% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221130255143 0.0743258471296 298% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144006402942 0.0701772020484 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.376204398715 0.128457276422 293% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033538643362 0.0628817314937 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.3799401198 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 98.500998004 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.