The diagram below shows the natural water purification system.
It is observed from pictorial representation about the information of natural water purification system. Which is clearly and coherently represented.
It is crystal clear that the process takes place with the assistance of sun. There are three stones which are placed on the trench. The trench is kept on the mud. Also, there are two plants and container in which pure water is contained, which are in the trench.
Firstly, Sun light falls upon the stones, which are upon the plastic sheet. Then, with the heat of sunlight the stones become hot, which create water. Next, this water condensed and flows into the trench. Afterwards, transpiration takes place with the help of plants. At last, condensed water converted into pure water and falls into the container.
Overall, it is evident that condensation and transpiration play part and parcel role in this process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 56
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world.Does the advantages of solar energy outweigh its disadvantages? 56
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto metro system for July,2017.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparison where neccesary? 73
- The chart below showd the annual number of rentals and sales of films from particular store between 2002 and 2011. 61
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto metro system for July,2017.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures and make comparison where neccesary? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16901408451 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67089940474 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570422535211 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3755819291 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 61.1666666667 112.824112599 54% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.8333333333 22.9334400587 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146782756736 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524631724014 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886828039458 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976178072436 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100526753993 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.