Human behavior is natural instincts of individuals in response to physical or emotional stimulus. Although it seems to be a bit absurd however if rules are emended, I believe a majority of humans would certainly try to change their behavior if the new rules requires it. Moreover, if not adhering to the rules will have challans or monetary loss, almost all humans would work on changing their behavior.
We work day and night for money and it is considered of utmost importance by all. Life without money cannot even be imagined as to survive in this world be it anywhere, you got to have money.
So, if a change in law does not have financial implications it could lead to less or no behavior changes however if financial implications are applied, human behavioral changes are bound to happen. I could site the following examples.
In New Delhi, it was observed that the air pollution level is considerably rising and inhabitants were asked to commute by public transport or of possible employ car pool techniques. This was considered to be of no importance until odd even rule with challan was imposed. People tried using public transport and car pooling for commuting.
Overall, I profoundly state that human behavior could be changed by laws however, there should be some financial implications attached to the law as well. Traffic signals, over-speeding and others have significant challans involved and hence people try to adhere to these laws. If no financial implications would have been bound to laws, it would seem nothing in the world is organized and everything would have gone hay-wire.
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 80
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for many reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and conclude. 88
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raffic signals, over-speeding and others have significant challans involved and h...
^^
Line 8, column 309, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...hese laws. If no financial implications would have been bound to laws, it would seem nothing in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01119402985 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77955522821 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574626865672 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1510255548 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.307692308 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46153846154 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252425981163 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794104042822 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826070053877 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124855352635 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076142045075 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.