Computers and modems have made it possible for office workers to do much of their work from home instead of working at offices every day. Working from home should be encouraged as it is good workers and employers.
Do you agree or disagree.
Computers, gadgets and other developed instruments have made lives full of welfare for human beings, and teleworking is one of them. It includes lots of advantageous and disadvantageous, which I will mention in my essay.
In one hand, it is beneficial for employer, especially for entrepreneur who don’t have vast capitals for renting a sufficient venue or paying commuting cost. In the other hand, it is useful for stuff and employee too. They are permitted to be with their family, to do their family and their employee responsibility simultaneously. By this facility, some of the common and social-oriented issue can be solved. For example, traffic jam, air pollution and many other problems will be mitigated. Rush hours will turn to calm period. As a considerable benefit Life cost will be reduced.
By contrast, it has its own drawbacks, human beings will turn to isolated people, and the real group working (team) will be disappeared slightly. Most of people may spend all of their times at home in front of their screen they will be addicted to staying in home; therefore they will suffer from different disease (physically and mentally) in coming years. The previous border between work and private life will disappear, therefore it can be a tremendous threat for their private life.
In conclusion, teleworking has its own merits and demerits. Both aspects are important. By the way I agree with teleworking due to the mentioned worthwhile, which can sugarcoat the disadvantageous, however this disastrous effect must not be forgotten.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-10-21 | maedeghorbanian | 67 | view |
2018-10-21 | maedeghorbanian | 67 | view |
2018-10-21 | maedeghorbanian | 61 | view |
- nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world.how can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously? 61
- school children are becoming far too dependent on computers. this is having an alarm effect on reading and writing skills. teachers need to avoid using computers in the classroom at all costs and go back to teaching basic study skills 56
- nowadays many countries have every cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world.how can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously? 61
- in a recent survey conducted in this country it was found that up to 20% of twelve years old in some schools were showing early signs of nicotine addictions. in the eighteen to twenty year age bracket the percentage was as high as 70%. A large contributin 11
- the graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevent 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ility simultaneously. By this facility, some of the common and social-oriented issue can be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 534, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d. Rush hours will turn to calm period. As a considerable benefit Life cost will b...
^^
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
...king team will be disappeared slightly. Most of people may spend all of their times at home in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18326693227 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06129091065 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621513944223 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.38672548 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7333333333 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178211276905 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048699351836 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440605646138 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893665156493 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057390953551 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.