Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.

Submitted by 1u2i3o4 on Mon, 10/22/2018 - 04:55

Health is a notable issue that affects all the worlds. To solve this problem governments increase numbers of sports facilities. However, opponents believes that sports facilities have minor effect to raise public health and propose to enhance other factors to solve health problems in public.
First of all, opponents indicate that sport facilities are passive investments to health because some unhealthy people don’t prefer to go these facilities or some people don’t have enough time to go there. Also, most of the sports facilities are suitable for fit people since some sports needs vigorous bodies. For example, most of the people who did not interested in sports in the past may injuries their muscles or bones. For this reason, government or institutes have better encourage people to do some light exercises such as walking to job or climbing the stairs are effective beginning to sport. These people defend that not only sports are fundamental to health but also pollution, economic troubles and stressful living affect strongly public mental and physical health. This substantial contamination and high stress level can easily transform healthy people to unhealthy people. For this reason, opponents suppose that sport facilities only a minor milestone to improve health when there are huge problems that affects people life.
Advocators of sports facilities imply that sports centers containing experienced trainers and high technologic equipments that vary ranging from beginner level to advanced level are the best way to do sports. They believe that sports strengthen immune system and level of illness in public dip. Also, stress level depends on peoples mind not the extrinsic factors so with the advent of sports people feel more relaxed and think positively. They defend who benefits these facilities become aware of diets and adapts their life to sport. With awareness usage of transportation using fossil fuels decreases and contamination of cities doesn’t become an important problem.
In conclusion some people unambiguous way to solve this problem is building sports facilities whereas other believes other solutions are required. I believe that sport is important but considering other factors that affecting health is necessary.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51289398281 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64804818266 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541547277937 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.008419051 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.176470588 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343043957506 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11932697486 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776721243206 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236844686383 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918071013296 0.056905535591 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.