spending on sports make sense?
In this day and age, no subject is as likely to spark controversy among governors as budget does. There are two schools of thought regarding the issue of the funding related to the realm of entertainment. On the one hand, a myriad of people are of the opinion that government should expend more money in the sport than art, one the other hand, others hold an antagonistic view. Yet to the best of my knowledge, spending on sports brings more benefit to society than the art does. I have some reasons for my conviction, two of which will be elucidated hereinafter.
The first reason why financing sports makes more sense is rooted in the fact that it motivates people to relinquish their sedentary life. To put it another way, nothing can tempt people to exercise as watching the success of a professional athlete does. In my book, a healthy body is a prerequisite for a healthy mind. Once somebody starts doing exercise, many of his problems will be demolished. For example, as a football fan, when I saw that my team was successful in international competitions, I was more eager to play football than ever before.
Another equally significant point to note is that at the moment, sports seem to become an industry. Many people are engaged in different sports and it is a source of livelihood for them. For example, one athlete needs a lot of experts, such as managers, psychologists, agents, to show his or her best performance. By thinning out the spending on sports, a whole host of people will be idle and this leads the unemployment rate to be leaped. For example, when one of our local football teams was unraveled, all the members of that team tried to land a new job. So, it does not make sense to make people idle.
The last one but not least one is that sports presage the power of a country. There are a lot of competitions all around the world in which people are competing with each other. The country that reaps most of the rewards is known as the best country among people. For example, one of the honors of the United States is their rank in the Olympic competition. This event makes The Americans proud of their country and everybody around the world sees this event.
What has been discussed above are the benefits brought by funding in sports. According to my standpoint, it is a sensible approach to spend a considerable money on sports due to the inspiration of people to start exercising, decreasing unemployment rate as well as the honor it brings to the countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-23 | ady | 70 | view |
| 2021-02-10 | Attia Yaqoob | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-22 | ssobhani_17 | 83 | view |
| 2016-08-24 | Rahul Keswani | 73 | view |
| 2016-08-23 | Rahul Keswani | 73 | view |
- integrated task TPO53 3
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'considerable money'.
Suggestion: considerable money
...int, it is a sensible approach to spend a considerable money on sports due to the inspiration of peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66515837104 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71565601209 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52036199095 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.462924331 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.652173913 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2173913043 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225088884282 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580872667539 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889621589728 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119452044913 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512138700857 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.