Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer language in the world.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, variety of language has been diminished, why, some of them have die out. Although some people believe that life will be more comfortable without different language, I reckon, we should make plane to preserve them as well as possible.
Some people say, it is not important to make effort to save different language, why the think with decreasing the linguistic diversity, communication among people will be improved, in other word if unpopular language die of, people will have to learn the same language and conversation will be organized better. In addition this approach think, by fewer languages, the related-expenditure of will also be less. In fact, not only is it not necessary to pay money for protecting languages again extinction, but also, the cost of education will also be reduced dramatically.
On the other hand, I think different languages are the root of diverse cultures which have existed until now. In other word with ding out a language, a culture is ruined inevitably. And also, it is clear that, beauty of world depend on various cultures and its specific features. Take as an illustration different civilizations along the history have been formed by distinct cultures, in addition without understanding the cultures, perception of civilizations is not possible, and furthermore, language is the main way of realizing the cultures. Moreover, I suppose, like a tree that never grow without its roots, a hardly could a society also progress without its languages and roots.
In conclusion, I could infer, however falling in diversity of language may reduce the cost totally, they act as a roots of a society and without them a community will never be able to promote.
- The graph shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 67
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. Others however believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these view and give your opinion. 67
- Competitiveness is considered to be a positive quality among people.How does competitiveness affect individuals?Is competitiveness a positive or negative qualities? 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what way has technology affected the type of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 78
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.To what agree do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... effort to save different language, why the think with decreasing the linguistic diversit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...nversation will be organized better. In addition this approach think, by fewer languages...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 113, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a root' or simply 'roots'?
Suggestion: a root; roots
...ay reduce the cost totally, they act as a roots of a society and without them a communi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, i reckon, i suppose, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1654676259 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00669508094 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571942446043 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.4906526917 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.545454545 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3636363636 7.06120827912 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273184926685 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101333091886 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698023478491 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160051950535 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873991427191 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.