A nation could not be rich enough if their people are in below poverty line or not well being rather than just a bunch of people of their nation able to achieve something. In this present era, there are so many nations which are trying to improve their people welfare by spending money on public health, education, woman empowerment and so on. I strongly believe on the public welfare of a nation is the better indication of nation's greatness than the achievement of rulers, artists, or scientists which I will explore by giving three example in the following essay.
First, for the nation, all people are their own children which are living in the same house and their responsibilities is to provide the basic needs and response their desire in an equally approach. If country could not able to provide the basic needs to their people then the country could not be take as a successful country in the world. For instance, India is rapidly growing country in the Asia they hugely invest in the field of science and technology, their film industry do three hundred million business but if we see the living standard of the people, we will fill pity after seeing there are thousands of people who is sleeping on the street, begging with street people, poor medical facility, poor sanitation and drinking water, no proper education for girls and poor people. We cannot imagine that India who is achieving major success in the field of science and technology by doing scientific experiment have very poor living condition for the general people. As a result, we cannot proudly say that India is great nation.
Second, it is always necessary for a country to achieve high in the field of art and science among other country. Greater achievement always helps to lead a country strongly and become a influential mover-shakers in the international politics. But, that does not mean, country should only focus on the scientific invention and prioritize their success on the basis of scientific success. If government also able to focus on the public well being that makes the good access for public in their well being and the achievement will be worth sharing and people of the nation celebrate as a major achievement.
Third, European nations are taken as a highly developed nation in worldwide only because they mainly focused on the living standard of their people. Last year when I visited Denmark, I was amazed to see the facilities the government provided to their public. Government their provide the free medical and, education up to university level. Besides that, Denmark, seriously concerned in the betterment for their children and senior citizen. That symbolize the well being of the general public and indicate the greatness of the country. If there was only scientific achievement I was not be able to feel the public welfare.
Hence, the general people well being is the direct reflection of the country status and their greatness rather than not because of achievement in scientific invention or art or ruler.
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People learn things better from those at their own level—such as fellow students or co-workers—than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. Use specific reasons and examples 70
- According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies a 26
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 29
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('equally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('approach') instead of another adjective.
...asic needs and response their desire in an equally approach. If country could not able to provide t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s to lead a country strongly and become a influential mover-shakers in the intern...
^
Line 7, column 478, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n. That symbolize the well being of the general public and indicate the greatness of the count...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 536, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... indicate the greatness of the country. If there was only scientific achievement I...
^^
Line 7, column 587, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...s only scientific achievement I was not be able to feel the public welfare. Hen...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...scientific invention or art or ruler.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, second, so, then, third, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2530.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 509.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97053045187 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59590571837 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453831041257 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.9615138385 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.157894737 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7894736842 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190705456031 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716329883934 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773835878826 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128721805243 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902905156008 0.0667264976115 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.