The horizontal reveals that informantion of representation the results of sirvey condicted by a personnel department at a major company.It is two divide agedgroup 18-30 and 45-60.
It is crystal clear that, team spirit was same about in the work performance.second,the chance for personal development and relaxed worked environment was upsurge the18- 30 aged group. Afterthat, survey conducted 45-60 was higher competent the boss and 18-30 was little bit fall down to 45-60 aged group.
On the flip side, there was more job security increased 18-30 aged group. Hence, but they have respect from colleagues to 45-60.Moreover, they have job satisfaction was equal to 18-60 aged group rathan than money was climb to youngerster aged.
To sum up, they have team spirit equal aged and work evironment are same 18-60 aged.
- The chart gives the information on the ages of the population of yemen and italy in 2000 and projection for 2050. 67
- In some countries it is illegal employers to reject job appications on the basis of age criteria .it a positive or negative development. 61
- Some people cliam that not enough of the water from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 56
- The table below shows the numbers of visitor to ashdowm.Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished .the charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two period the sam 73
- Do you think card less society is realistic and why? what are the advantages and disadvantages 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...personnel department at a major company.It is two divide agedgroup 18-30 and 45-60...
^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...ame about in the work performance.second,the chance for personal development and rel...
^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...higher competent the boss and 18-30 was little bit fall down to 45-60 aged group. On th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...y have respect from colleagues to 45-60.Moreover, they have job satisfaction was equal t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, moreover, second, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 695.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 131.0 196.424390244 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30534351145 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.38312328216 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10873586538 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.687022900763 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 198.0 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0801754901 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367303479528 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188638326202 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589136596152 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213701633636 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063731545107 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.