Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give them more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of whether universities should provide so much theoretical knowledge or give more practical training throughout their courses and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by the substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that giving more practical training in the student’s curriculum can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, more practical courses than theoretical ones can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, giving less theoretical curriculum might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creating processes is correlated negatively with the vital issue. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of providing more practical training for university students' course far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues and potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-29 | goli.mohsen | 88 | view |
| 2018-10-19 | goli.mohsen | 88 | view |
- some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 85
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 88
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give them more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give them more practical training throughout their courses. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 88
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8984962406 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24713896691 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672932330827 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6855783076 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.636363636 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285839032886 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927444542105 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092591022297 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155939735589 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748918780341 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.