There are many opinions on whether the already scarce land should be used for human needs or for saving the endangered species. Some people believes that human needs should take priority over endangered animals, while some favours animals needs. In my opinion, we should prioritise the endangered species because we can adapt and find other ways to fulfil our needs for farmland, housing and industry without disturbing the ecosystem.
First of all, we can fulfil our needs and at the same time save the land for other species, endangered or not. We are the most intelligent species on this planet and at various times have proved that we are capable of doing anything. Therefore we can also find a way to fulfil our needs without disturbing the nature by being more creative and innovative. We can design multi-storied buildings that can accommodate many families in very small land or we can modify the crops genetically which can give high food in a small piece of land.
Second, we have already lost so many species in last centuries. Now a days, rhinoceros can only be found either on a TV or in a zoo and if we are not considerate enough the list will just grow. All animals are important in keeping the life cycle balanced, and we can upset the cycle unless we save the animals, or at the very least leave them on their own in their own habitat without making any disturbing. Once a species is lost, they are gone forever.
To sum up, I believe that each animal, no matter how small it is, is an important part of ecosystem and deserves equal share of mother nature. We can always find a way to satisfy our needs by being more innovative or creative and without taking the share of animals. Therefore, its better to leave some land for the animals too while we look for any alternate way.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
- 41)Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... that we are capable of doing anything. Therefore we can also find a way to fulfil our ne...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...lost so many species in last centuries. Now a days, rhinoceros can only be found either on...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
... so many species in last centuries. Now a days, rhinoceros can only be found either on...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to equal'
Suggestion: to equal
...mportant part of ecosystem and deserves equal share of mother nature. We can always f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.0752688172 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6230529595 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43539200309 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545171339564 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3300692125 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169124443182 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718140991874 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696258371068 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121330179028 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825628729077 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.