It is true that nowadays, animals are widely used to satisfy human needs for food, entertainment and scientific exploration. In my opinion, while I tend towards the view that animal exploitation is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal exploitation because of undeniable benefits.
On the one hand, there are some ethical arguments against the use of animals for human needs. Firstly, humans have no right to subject animals to any kind of confinement or trauma and the lives of all creatures should be respected. Such critics argue that the benefits to human do not justify the suffering caused and human should explore alternative ways to benefit their lives. Secondly, taking some exploitations on animals might contain potential dangers and put human in a life-threatening situation. For example, new medicines which are successfully tested on mice or rats might cause serious side effects on human body and even worse, kill the patient.
On the other hand, I support regulated animal exploitation because of several indisputable reasons. The first reason is that humans use and exploit animals in myriad ways, including milk, meat, egg, fur and so on. Secondly, experiments on animals help to advance scientific and medical knowledge. Research using animals directly contribute to the development of vaccines, antibiotics and medical procedures that save many humans and animals lives. Furthermore, researchers are now aiming to find new methods to minimize the suffering that dogs or mice may experience in laboratory. Personally, I also agree that unnecessary testing of cosmetics and household products on animals should be banned because the suffering caused outweigh the human curiosity.
In conclusion, from various reasons I mentioned above, I support the view that animal exploitation should be limited to only indispensable purposes like food and medical testing.
- Government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Some people say it is OK to use animals for our benefit others say it is not good to exploit them Discuss both points of view and give your opinion 86
- Some people think that good health is a basic human need, so the medical service should not be run by profit-making companies. Do you think the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43434343434 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.959720448 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2335298391 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184796002302 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724105866652 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450695382001 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121748475713 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365297319715 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.