Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In a team, those who do not accept others’ criticism cannot succeed.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In a team, those who do not accept others’ criticism cannot succeed.
There is an old expression in my mother language which says ”Not anyone in entire world is entirely the same”. Every person has his own way of thinking and mindset. We can not make everyone to act as we want him to but when it comes to team-work, the situation is different. One controversial discussion in studying team-work behaviors is either accepting criticism is beneficial for members of the team or not. There might be some people who hold the view that accepting criticism will cause harm to members. However I hold the opposite view and I believe that criticism acceptance is one characteristic necessary to every member of a team. I will elaborate on my most outstanding rationales in what follows.
The most important reason that comes to my mind has something to do with concept of team. By being in a team, the benefits of the team comes before individual benefits. Therefore, everybody must do anything for the sake of the team and accepting criticism is one way to reach this goal. By accepting criticism, members are respecting the others’ view of themselves and when they consider criticism, they are the first who benefit from those critisicm by eliminating they errors. Nonetheless, if members do not consider others’ criticism, not only they are causing problem for themselves, but also they hurt the team as a whole. Hence, by accepting criticism, members will seem more team-player and they contribute to themselves and to the team.
Additionally, the members who do not tolerate criticism will not have good relationship with other members. A person that do not listen to others’ opinion of himself will seem stuborn and self-centered. Obviously, nobody likes this kind of personality and this person will gradually loose his place in his teammates’ eyes. In a study conducted by Sharif university on this subject, results show that the more gregarious and outgoing a person is, the more prosperous he is in his career. Therefore, by accepting others’ criticism, we will have a better relationship in our team and as a consequence we will be more succesful in our career.
To cut the long story short, accepting criticism is a major fact in ones’ success. By accepting criticism people will seem more a team-player and lovable. I suggest to those who are unsatisfied with their team and career, to try being more a team-player and more outgoing and I am pretty sure that the reactions and results will strike them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-06 | Thomas2028 | 71 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...One controversial discussion in studying team-work behaviors is either accepting ...
^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...g criticism will cause harm to members. However I hold the opposite view and I believe ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... do not tolerate criticism will not have good relationship with other members. A ...
^^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...sonality and this person will gradually loose his place in his teammates' eyes. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05773672055 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02296324501 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473441108545 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8884790089 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2173913043 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8260869565 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.17391304348 5.45110844103 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436681862371 0.236089414692 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147567843129 0.076458572812 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163085944694 0.0737576698707 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.356400115172 0.150856017488 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.3239417217 0.0645574589148 502% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.