In a number of countries, some people think it is neccessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
These day, with a developing of modern life, demands of people are also increasing significantly, especially transportation. Therefore, while some people think the railway lnes should be rebuilding for very fasst trains between cities, others believe that the money need to be spent on improving public transport. In my view, these two opinions still had their right side, but it would be better if they are combined.
Spending money on changing railway lines could be improve the country's technology. A lot developing countries have been operating the process to construct the railway. So this could brings experiences , lessons for technology as wll as reach the trend about achievement of the world. Moreover, create fast trains can make this closer to citizen. Recently, because of the increasing of another public transports such as private cars, bus, taxi, etc more and more people doesn't use the train anymore. So creating very fast train could lead people to an esier way in travelling so that, they can pay attention back to this transport.
Besides improving railway line, ti's also neccessaty to renew the public transport in life. It gives people comfort and convinience when go to school or office. Thus, it would be more perfect if these transport is improved.
Personally, I believe that these ideas need to be combined logically in order to give people a better life
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The graphs show the percentage of loans in different categories in 2 libraries between 1980 and 2010 with predicted figures for 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- In a number of countries, some people think it is neccessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.discuss both t 73
- In the past people usually stayed in one place throughout their life These days people often move around They often live in several different places in their lifetime What are the advantages and disadvantages of both 56
- Many children these days have an unhealthy lifestyle Both schools and parents are responsible for this problem To what extent do you agree with this problem 56
- Creativity is the key to problem solving To what extent do you agree with this statement Give reason to support your answer 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...le in the USA going to eat at fast food everyday was begun with almost 4% in 2003. Howev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...ood restaurrants was one two groups who had highest percent. In 2003, the number reached 32...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...high percent accounted for 30% in 2003. After there was a dramatic fall from 300% to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43523316062 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44745033754 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549222797927 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6117924988 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.3333333333 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173435618619 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636393617786 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06408583386 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15004236137 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177239233618 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 89.08 61.2550243902 145% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.