Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution.
The fast-emerging technology in this era has exerted a profound influence on our living environment. The question of whether opting for a simpler life is deemed as a viable solution to address environmental issues or not is now a matter of considerable public concern. From my perspective, we are taking technical advancement as an excuse to blame for playing havoc to our environment; for me, it is human race who makes a decision on its effect on our surroundings.
On the one hand, it is argued by some that a simple life is a highly recommended resolution towards an issue of environmental degradation caused by having been overwhelmingly dependent on technology. The concept of pursuing a simple lifestyle varies from people to people. For many, it is believed that a simple life merely means that people ought to have a mitigation plan on managing their technology dependency. A handful of people hold a belief that the thrive of technology has resulted in the fast-paced growth of industry, especially smokestack industries which can damage environment. Indeed, the development of heavy industries such as iron or steelworks can allow the factories in this sector to spew a considerable amount of exhaust fumes into air, which either directly or indirectly affects environment as well as people’s health. Therefore, following a simple life can favor a brighter future image of a world where people alleviate their suffer from environmental problems.
However, those who are dissenters towards such a view and I are inclined to the idea that technology itself can be successful in ecosystem as long as it is intentionally designed to fit the natural system. Apparently, the advent of technical advancement appears to serve human’s purpose. To tackle different concerns emerging in lives, people have been coming up with various inventions and consistently enhancing them to satiate their desires. In fact, whether people consciously make use of technology would determine its effect on their living environment. For example, when a country uses cutting-edged technology to spur its farm productivity, the farming land may confront a matter of impoverishment. Reversely, the result will be different if using technical advances is under strict surveillance with the matter of building material and frequency carefully taken into account.
In conclusion, technology is a double-edged sword. From my point of view, I would reckon that human race plays a main role in deciding its influence on living environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | SATYAVENI YANDRAPU | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-21 | jakirph365 | 78 | view |
- What matters to you and why? 80
- Given the high unemployment rate, it is recommended that the government only provide primary education and no secondary education. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 89
- Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. 78
- What matters to you. And why? 11
- Do you think it is better to send criminals to prison or let them receive education or job trainings? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
...nd influence on our living environment. The question of whether opting for a simpler life is deemed as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 454, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... A handful of people hold a belief that the thrive of technology has resulted in the fast-...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...environmental problems. However, those who are dissenters towards such a view and I ar...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3275 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23850949512 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5725 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6425028139 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.352941176 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5294117647 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198673485054 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067095867158 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456458476246 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113108212535 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410284088011 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.