Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
It is the politics what decides the future of a country; and it is the leader that and his honesty upon which the politics of a country is based. I generally agree with the claim that consistent adherence to a particular guiding principal is most important for a leader. Nevertheless, it may be wise for a leader to compromise and address the public opinion if the cause is in favor of the most of the people in the country.
In the first place, honesty is a very important characteristic of a leader and people judge leader’s honesty by their loyalty and commitments to the principle that they say they are following. If a leader lost public faith on him, he/she is very likely to be ineffective in the arena of politics. By way of example, Mahatma Gandhi of India started a non-violent passive resistance movement against the British in 1942. He adhered to his principle honestly and as result, people appeared to unite in the movement and eventually he became successful to free his country from the British rule. Gandhi received supports from the people because of his determination and consistent adherence to his nonviolent principle. And today Gandhi is one of the most revered leaders in the world.
Moreover, another world’s most revered leader Nelson Mandela spent twenty seven years in prison fighting for the people who were suppressed by the regime. Even if in prison, he never yielded to the regime; instead, he relentlessly kept advocating the principle of equality among all. Consequently, Mr. Mandela earned him unprecedented supports from the people and led the anti-apartheid movement which ended in a good note securing democracy in South Africa.
Admittedly, sometimes there may be the circumstances in which a leader might have to yield to the public opinion if the public opinion is intense and any step against the opinion seems to cause public outrage. As an example, people in Nepal called for the end of monarchy in 2015 where as constitutional monarchy was accepted by all political parties. In the meantime, leader of the parties realize the appropriateness of public demand and they declared that they no longer support the monarchy. Following the nineteen days struggle the monarchy relented and Nepal was declared as secular republic country.
In conclusion, even though leader sometimes might have to yield to public opinion, but in most of the situation, strict adherence to the principals makes a leader more effective than those who yield to the public opinion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | yswang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | sudesh tiwari | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Daffodilia | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | nimesh94 | 50 | view |
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 54
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
- Government must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-seven
...ost revered leader Nelson Mandela spent twenty seven years in prison fighting for the people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
... called for the end of monarchy in 2015 where as constitutional monarchy was accepted by...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...those who yield to the public opinion.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, honestly, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04807692308 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88890706387 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492788461538 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7476977774 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.529411765 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4705882353 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305363861429 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982138229833 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698402357349 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184781743812 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588384999817 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.