TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

When it comes to the education, there are several crucially important factors should be taken into account. According to the fact that the quality of education would directly be related to the future of each society, it is one of the most controversial issue, whether universities increase the budget for mentor’s salaries or not. In my view, it is not necessary to spend more money to professor’s wage. There are three mail reasons to support my idea.

First and foremost, the income of professors in universities all over the world is placed between the best incomes. In other words, teaching in university could be considered as a lucrative job. University professors often have a wealthy life, since they have other resources to increase their incomes such as new researches and preparing papers. In addition, they receive money for each supervision in university.

Another prominent reason is that, there are more significant things should be spent money for, to improve the quality of education, such as, laboratory equipment, library or sport facilities. I believe that spending money on these items will impacts on student's satisfaction of university and they will be encouraged for more effort. For example, when I was a university student of Master, my thesis was on extracting DNA of insects. Because our university did not have enough equipment I should go to another university in the capital city and it took longer time to get result than if I did it in my university. After a while I was disappointed and came to the conclusion to change my thesis subject to the one which did not need especial equipment, even though I like the first one more.

Last but not least, teaching is one of the most awarding career in the world, since, there is no joy better than to broaden student's horizon by teaching them. This job could be regarded as a Doctor that cure a blind person but not by surgery, by science. So, such a valuable job should not evaluate with its salary and the materialistic aspect.

To sum up, all aforementioned reasons bring us to this conclusion that there are other ways to promote the quality of education rather than rising professor’s salary. Furthermore, teaching is not only its materialistic aspect, but its spiritual. It should be mentioned that the teaching in university is one of the best job considering the level of income.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 Somayya 66 view
2020-01-07 kangyan 76 view
2020-01-06 kangyan 76 view
2020-01-06 kangyan 76 view
2020-01-06 kangyan 76 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user yas86 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'impact'
Suggestion: impact
...that spending money on these items will impacts on students satisfaction of university ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ng money on these items will impacts on students satisfaction of university and they wil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts salary and the materialistic aspect. To sum up, all aforementioned reasons br...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, in my view, in other words, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 400.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.985 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93281434803 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5275 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0859687207 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.947368421 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0526315789 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.89473684211 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17996969936 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564020267322 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369817765135 0.0737576698707 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973871284018 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385522661508 0.0645574589148 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.