Nowadays, due the complexities of modern life, people have to work hard in order to survive in the current economic climate. People in every stage of their live try to earn money at least to be enough for their daily expenses. Therefore, some people prefer to be multi-task. Many people are adhere to increase the university’s salary in order to maintain a high quality of education, while others believe instead of increasing the professors salary, the university should spend its money on making library, computer lab and so on. Ego, when it comes to my stance, by weighing up the pros and cons, I firmly hold that increasing the professors salary could improve the quality of education. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to justify my point of view.
The first exquisite to be mentioned is that when professors have enough salary to afford their needs, they will concentrate on their job and do their best to complete the syllabus on the best way. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. In Afghanistan, teachers of schools and professors have low salary. Therefore, they have to find a part time job to afford their needs. When they are multi-task, they con not focus on their main job. An experience has done in this regard, they payed enough money for teachers and forced them to leave their job. The result surprised them. Students dramatically were eager to pass most of their time in the university and do more research by the help of their professors.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that if the teachers have high salary, they would have enough energy and motivation in their major, and easily they can transform it to their students. For example, as I am a teacher in the university, if my salary be enough for my needs, so I have lots of energy to cooperate with my students and motivate them to learn better, because I do not any concern about my economic problems, and I focus more on my teaching quality.
In brief, contemplating all aforementioned reasons, I believe that high salary od professors has a dramatic impact on their class quality. This will have a good effect on the stimulation of students and also its consequence would be surprisingly.
- TPO 31 Integrated Writing Task 63
- Do you agree of disagree with following statement?Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 76
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 70
- TPO 28 - Integrated Writing Task 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...thers believe instead of increasing the professors salary, the university should spend its...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 638, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...cons, I firmly hold that increasing the professors salary could improve the quality of edu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 352, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... salary. Therefore, they have to find a part time job to afford their needs. When they ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... my students and motivate them to learn better, because I do not any concern about my ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83678756477 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79523114179 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50518134715 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1839781995 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.722222222 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115724120496 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353598304261 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521064402144 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067559851577 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553560247617 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.