The bar graph shows the number of overseas students enrolled in the first year law course at a college.
The bar graph demonstrate the overseas students take admission according to the gender and in interesting field of law at college.
Overall, what stand out from the graph is that while male students of Indonesia and Japan were respectively, shoot up. At this point, France students were tumble.
With regarding to in Iran males and females students go down in labour law which are about 5 and 3 students respectively and next which who company law student approximately double. Additionally, in Philippines there are 3 males students and 1female are considerably intrusting in labour law and in the company law student dramatically changed. In contrast, Indonesia labour law student remainly same as well as females. But company law male students is shoot up.
Turning to, in Japan males students are soar intrusting and females are approximately 5 students. However, France is a country which are no one female students of company law very decline students of labour law. Following this, total number of students steadily same and 3 students are reached at the final.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-16 | Sukchain appur 56 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-16 | Gurpreet_5577 | 73 | view |
- The bar graph shows the number of overseas students enrolled in the first year law course at a college. 73
- Dry method of coffee production 69
- The Brick Manufacturing Process 78
- Dry method of coffee production 80
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are go out what are the cause and solutions? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tumbled'.
Suggestion: tumbled
...up. At this point, France students were tumble. With regarding to in Iran males and f...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16091954023 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86999778806 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3086596422 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305922830464 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146975002654 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788603351974 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217935223903 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837910394192 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.