9-Integrated Writing
The passage suggests that the fuel cell-based engine is better than internal-combustion engine. However, the lecturer disagrees wth it.
First, the author states that internal-combustion engine relies on petroleum which is finite and unrenewable while hydrogen fuel cell engine requires hydrogen, which can be derived in various sources. But the professor opposes it by saying that hydrogen is not easily available and not directly usable since it is hard to be obtained and stored in a pure liquid state. It is highly artificial, and have to be kept in a -253 celsius degrees to reamain the liquid state.
Second, according to the reading fuel cell engine can solve many pollution problem because it only produces water as the by-product rather than CO2. In contrast, the purification of hydrogen need to burn coals and oil. As a result, the factories will emit pollutions eventhough car does not pollute.
Third, the reaing material claims that fuel cell engine is economically competitive which more efficient in using energy. On the other hand, the speaker proclaims that it is expensive to burn hydrogen because the burning process requires platinum a rare and expensive metal which can make help hydrogen undergo reactions. In addition, there is no other cheaper metal to replace platinum which means fuel cell engine has no advantage over internal combustion engine and cannot replace internal-combustion in the near future.
- 10-W1 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to attract more tourists government should improve the safety by hiring more police or improve the appearance by improving the old buildings and streets 43
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child (ages 5 to 10)? Why?1)Being helpful to others2)Being honest3)Being well-organizedUse specific examples and evidences to support your answer. " 90
- Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation trying to decide between two places to visit Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice Why Reading about the places online Discussing the places wi 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful leaders should make others part of the decision making process 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wth it. First, the author states that internal-combustion engine relies on pet...
^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hly artificial, and have to be kept in a -253 celsius degrees to reamain the liq...
^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tificial, and have to be kept in a -253 celsius degrees to reamain the liquid st...
^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun pollution seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much pollution', 'a good deal of pollution'.
Suggestion: much pollution; a good deal of pollution
... the reading fuel cell engine can solve many pollution problem because it only produces water ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32894736842 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98584366443 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9194752372 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.454545455 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.