The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000. The total budget was AED 315 billion.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the amount of money, UAE spent in 2000. Ten categories are given: law and order, health and personal social services, social security education and others.
It can be seen from the chart, that social security has the biggest share of total, at 100 AED billion, while the smallest share belongs to transport, at 9 AED billion.
The government spent 100 AED billion on social security and this is the biggest share of total. Health and personal social services has the second biggest share, at 53 AED billion. Education has the third biggest share and UAE funded it with 38 AED billion. Both Other expenditure and the Debt interest received 46 AED billion in total.
Turning to small segments, it can be seen, that Defense was funded with 22 AED billion. Law and order received with 17 AED billion, while Housing heritage and environment received 2 AED billion less. Before the smallest share comes, Industry, agriculture and employment received 13 AED billion. The smallest share belongs to Transport and government spent 9 AED billion on it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-22 | Phatle20010807 | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-10 | sanjay marwaha | 89 | view |
| 2018-11-18 | Fer | 60 | view |
- Today, more and more people choose to live by themselves. What are the causes of this? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 79
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media forcommunicating information. State which you consider to be the most effective. • comics • books • radio • television • film • theatre 67
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds ofmeat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0393258427 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50698431029 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2542361557 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5454545455 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1818181818 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135433861737 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666341992602 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351820950509 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907115214446 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159035338572 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.