Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are solutions?
It is true that there has been increasingly more competition between the young and the old who are in search in the same jobs. While there are some negative consequences of this trend, certain measures can be adopted to mitigate these potential problems.
When older applicants have to compete with the younger ones for a job, several related problems can be anticipated. First and foremost, this may be the main culprit of an increase in the rate of youth unemployment. To explain, older people tend to be given favourable consideration by recruiters due to their vast experience in comparison with the young generation, which may lead to the scarcity of work for younger people. Furthermore, this competition may exert an adverse effect on the citizens’ quality of life. This is because if youngsters suffer from being unemployed and the shortage of a stable source of income, some of them may commit crimes to feed themselves and their family. As a result, not only will the life quality of the young diminish, but their safety will also be threatened.
However, the problems described above can be combated by implementing some measures. The most important solution is decreasing the legal retirement age. To illustrate, if this policy is introduced, the pressure of competition can be alleviated. An ideal resolution to alleviate the threats of job competition between the young and the old is to raise the state pension. This is due to that some retirees who find their pension sufficient for living will not have to return to work.
To sum up, the situation of competing for a job among youngsters and older people results in some problems such as the growth of unemployed young people or the dinimishing of citizens’ quality of life. However, various actions can be taken to tackle the problems, including declining the legal retirement age and increasing the state pension.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-22 | truognchinh | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-22 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-22 | truognchinh | 73 | view |
| 2018-09-30 | danial08cse | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-05 | hoanglinhhus | 56 | view |
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels a.g gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Other argue that happiness depends on other factors. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? 73
- 20.Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. Other believe individuals can also do somethings to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- The best way to solve world’s environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Topic 1: Some students prefer to take a gap year and between high school university to work or to travel. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the young generation, which may lead to the scarcity of work for younger people....
^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by implementing some measures. The most important solution is decreasing the leg...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, such as, as a result, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06389776358 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92916366833 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543130990415 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4654036047 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192850362768 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063031256967 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641510719629 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11985419553 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245650080259 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.