Most people can handle problems and difficulties on their own or with the help from their families, so there is no need to depend on the government
Currently, due to the fierce competition existing in the society and the continuously widening gap between the haves and have-nots, there is an increasing number of individuals suffering from diversified problems. Some people reckons that people are supposed to handle the problems with the help of their families, while others reckon that the government ought to reach out its hands to help citizens plagued with living problems to tackle them. Personally speaking, I contend that the authority should help people to address the issues no matter they can tackle it or not and there are a couple of reasons to account for my view.
To start with, based on the archaeological theory of the social contract, it is the authority’s responsibility to help individuals handle problems, since individuals gave the government their individual rights. To be more specific, the government is erected on the foundation of rights imparted from individuals, thus the construction of the government aims to address the problems. Provided that the government fails to fulfill its duty of tackling issues, it is meaningless to erect the regimes, worse still, individuals even are capable of withdrawing their rights. For instance, with regard to the social health care, each individual living in the country has levied taxes to the regime, which enables the regime to distribute the fund maintain the well-being of the society, involving the construction of social health system. The individuals are not responsible to levy taxes if the authority does not undertake the responsibility to enhance their living standards. Thus, the authority ought to take on its responsibility to help people get out of the traps of problems.
What’s more, not all problems emerging in people’s lives can be addressed by individuals’ strengths, which requires the government to reach out its hands. To be more specific, as the saying goes, there is strength in numbers, which illuminates that the regime, as a system consisting of individuals’ rights, is more qualified to do with a large number of social issues. For instance, during the process of civilization, China is enslaved by the ever-rising rate of unemployment. Since this problem can be ascribed to varieties of factors, like the unreasonable structure of industries, individuals are and have always been incapable of tackling such kinds of problems related with the whole society. Therefore, without the power from the regime, people cannot address these issues.
Admittedly, a bunch of problems can be addressed by individuals or their families, nevertheless, due to the factors’ properties related with the whole society, the government’s participation in specific issue is of crucial significance.
In a nutshell, the government is supposed to take on the responsibility of help citizens to handle problems, not only due to their responsibility originating from its foundation but also owing to its irreplaceable role played in maintaining the well-being of the whole society.
- A leader should have strong opinions and not change his or her opinions 90
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep pursuing them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better and why? 47
- Which kind of professors will you choose when selecting the courses?1. Some professors who are voted to be the most popular one.2. Some professors who are rewarded of outstanding research. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement:Nowadays it is not important for people to have regular family meals together. 73
- What is the most important factor that affect the lasting time of a friendship help each other at difficult time have same interests trust each other completely 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s; rights, is more qualified to do with a large number of social issues. For instance, during the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, to start with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 52.1666666667 165% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2575.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44397463002 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29703999967 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471458773784 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 786.6 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8536032857 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.9375 100.406767564 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5625 20.6045352989 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277470713171 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972867266568 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762674531288 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178525980426 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603990529249 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 11.7677419355 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 58.1214874552 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.