venus is an inhospitable place for we human being to live permanently
The reading passage is discussing the possibility of settling on Venus, the professor is also investigating the same issue, however, what the professor contradicts with the statement in the article. He reckons that it is plausible to maintain a permanent human presence on Venus as long as we set a float in the atmosphere, like a balloon, which is 50 kilometers upper the surface and he utilizes three convincing arguments to underpin his point.
To start with, the reading passage suggests that owing to the extreme pressure at Venus's surface, not only the spacecraft but also humans landed on Venus would be crushed within an hour, however, the professor states that provided that the station we establish is high enough, the pressure there can be lowered to the pressure equal to the pressure in earth's surface, therefore individuals are capable of avoiding suffering from extreme pressure.
What's more, despite the assertion in the reading passage that there are no reservoirs of water and oxygen on Venus's surface and atmosphere and it is impractical to transport water and oxygen from earth, the professor contends that with the compound existing in the atmosphere, especially the sulfuric acid and carbon dioxide, water and oxygen can be easily produced through a series of chemical reactions, hence, it is not necessary to import supplement from earth to Venus.
Finally, the author of the reading passage indicates that due to the thick clouds and the dense layer of carbon dioxide, most of the sunlight cannot reach the surface, thus solar power cells fail to utilize solar energy to generate electricity for humans to power their equipment, whereas the professor rebuts that since the station is erected in the atmosphere upper the surface, the clouds there are not thick compared to the surface. Meanwhile, the station can also make use of the sunlight reflected by the layer of carbon dioxide, therefore utilizing both the direct and reflected sunlight, more electricity can be produced to supply humans' equipment.
In a nutshell, the professor convincingly pinpoints the weaknesses existing in the reading article and verifies that it is plausible for we human beings to live in Venus permanently as long as we establish the station in the atmosphere of Venus.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-06 | zheng__zy | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-25 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement:Nowadays it is not important for people to have regular family meals together. 73
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep pursuing them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better and why? 47
- Most of the parents at sometimes find disapproval of the ways teachers are teaching their childern. It's not suggested for the parents to express their disapproval to teachers. 90
- Government has done enough to educate people the importance of a balanced lifestyle and healthy eating habits 97
- What is the most useful way to help the natural environment?Plant more trees and build parksStores stop providing plastic bagsIncrease access to public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the road 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...iding suffering from extreme pressure. Whats more, despite the assertion in the read...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o transport water and oxygen from earth, the professor contends that with the com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 371.0 270.72406181 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14555256065 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73260067666 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479784366577 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 419.366225166 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 53.0 21.2450331126 249% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.947161206 49.2860985944 229% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 272.714285714 110.228320801 247% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 53.0 21.698381199 244% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 7.06452816374 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239868781881 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12183878115 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117628467571 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154025900058 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124680882265 0.0443174109184 281% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.3 13.3589403974 219% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 53.8541721854 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 24.0 11.0289183223 218% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.48 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.42419426049 122% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.2 10.498013245 221% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.2008830022 214% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.