The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors who came to the UK for different purposes between 1989 and 2009

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors who came to the UK for different purposes between 1989 and 2009.

The line graph demonstrate the United Kingdom was visited for different purposes by the overseas tourist over the time period of 1989 and 2009.
Overall, what stand out from the graph is that while the popularity of holiday tourist grew over the period in question, and that of business visitors remained high throughout, the meeting friends and relatives visitors interested and fell sharply, mean while, saw an increase followed by drop.
With regard to business and holiday, the starting figures were roughly identical at 5 and 7 million visitors respectively. However, whereas the former climbed to reach 9 million in 1994 before levelling off the remainder of period, the latter peaked at 8 million visitors in 2009 and then slipped to half this figure in 1999.
Turning to, the meeting friends and relatives, guest stayed consistently popular, with 3 to 7 million throughout the period. Business popularity was nearly as high as holiday's first half the century significantly decline, with the number of favourable visitors rising 40 to 80 million but 2004 to 2009 saw visitors number crash to 71 millions. After that in 1989 to 2009 meeting friends and relatives sharply boomed up at 7 million visitors. Finally it slightly decrease and reached in 63 millions.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-16 Shoxjaxon.13 74 view
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: meanwhile
...s visitors interested and fell sharply, mean while, saw an increase followed by drop. Wit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 2004 to 2009 saw visitors number crash to 71 millions. After that in 1989 to 20...
^^
Line 4, column 443, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...harply boomed up at 7 million visitors. Finally it slightly decrease and reached in 63 ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 463, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreases'?
Suggestion: decreases
...7 million visitors. Finally it slightly decrease and reached in 63 millions.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, then, whereas, while, as to, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13526570048 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68441722258 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5444573325 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.875 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190561635977 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824023170216 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863097042559 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131599832456 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090076525143 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.