The bar charts demonstrate the proportion of people in two age groups who bought concert, cinema and theatre tickets online in the first three months of 2006 in three different countries, namely Australia, Great Britain and Malaysia, as well as the percentage of internet access via Desktop computer, Laptop and Mobile phone in these countries.
It is obvious from the data that the middle age group was the major group of purchasing tickets and the most buying online tickets by internet was Malaysia in all devices.
More than half of these countries, in fact 2 out of 3, had the majority of ticket sales from people who had aged between 25 and 44 years old. In Australia and UK, the buying rate of people in this group was equal at 55% while the senior citizen (over 65 years old) accounted for 45% of sales in Australia and 40% in UK. However, the senior group in Malaysia purchased online tickets, at 40% of sales, more than that of middle age group by 3%.
A notable feature is that the access of internet for buying tickets via Desktop computer was the most percentage in all countries. Malaysia had the highest internet access at 63% and followed by Great Britain and Australia at 60% and 57% respectively. A similar pattern was repeated in Mobile phone. The difference is that there was a 28% in the entering of internet in Malaysia whereas the UK was less than that about 5% and 6% for Australia. For internet access by Laptop, the least access was the UK at 30% and the others were around 40%.
- the pie charts show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 67
- The charts below show how selected age groups purchased concert, cinema, and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2006 in three countries and how the Internet was accessed. 67
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 67
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, well, whereas, while, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62081784387 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42024280046 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490706319703 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 365.4 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7048166676 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.3 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260182233488 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10525264326 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897191147072 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18809405627 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087697246659 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.