whether or not discovered very old fossil structures were bee nests.
The reading and the lecture have contradictory opinion about whether or not discovered very old fossil structures were bee nests. The author of the extract provides three reasons all of which cast doubt on the very structures to be considered as bee nests. In the contrast, the professor in the lecture sees such a consideration, the very fossil structures resemble bee nests, conceivable and she refutes each of article's reasons.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, founder have not discovered any fossil of actual bees recorded to 200 million years ago. In his or her view, this knowledge is a good reason to reject the idea of bee nests. Nonetheless, the professor in the lecture disputes above-mentioned article's judgment by saying that bees' fossil would have not been preserved only if there had been tree with sticky liquid in. She mentioned that such trees were rare at those time, and they were common years later, so it is not surprising that there are not any fossil of bees.
The professor in the lecture further asserts that it is a possible hypothesis that bees fed on nonflowering plants before they evolved. This claim refutes the writer implication that idea of bees nests is not good because of the absence of flowering plants 200 million years ago.
The text lasting insists that the very found structures are in the lack of some details of nests made by modern bees, like caps closed to the chambers of modern bee nests. Nevertheless, the professor in the lecture discounts this by referring to chemical analysis of the chamber of structures which was the same as modern nests. In fact, bees use waterproofing around the spiral pattern of caps, and the same material of them found in the very analysis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-26 | Nina Tsarevich | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | Youngyoung | 86 | view |
| 2021-09-11 | Youngyoung | 90 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | hanieh.azad | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | hanieh.azad | 85 | view |
- When you decides which of the two places to visit, you will have two of the following choices :1. Discuss with someone who has visited the two places.2. Read online.Which one do you think is better ?Use details and examples to support your answer. 71
- consulting with others or making decision alone 76
- Robert E. Peary's claim, a well-known adventure and arctic explorer, about reaching to North Pole in 1909 75
- Rembrandt's painting 73
- declining of yellow cedars 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ecture have contradictory opinion about whether or not discovered very old fossil structures w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 334, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
...tioned articles judgment by saying that bees fossil would have not been preserved on...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88590604027 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64289814212 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513422818792 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9454180809 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465145364497 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169042245653 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158756038318 0.0662205650399 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263060022664 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192088818006 0.0443174109184 433% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.