4days work week and its benefit
Both the lecture and the passage discuss the time hours of working for employees. The passage says that it would be beneficial for both employees and companies if employee have option of working for 4-days a week instead of 5-days a week, while lecture oppose this claim.
First, the passage says that when some employees work for 4-days a week they will get three fourth of their normal pay. So, this option give company benefit with pay less. Additionally, employees have more time to rest and get relax, hence they make fewer costly wrong during their task that it is as an advantagefor company. Even though, the lecture denies this by stating that the company will be forced adding more employees, following more office for them that result in spend more money by company.
Second, the passage states that by this changing, more job will be available for others, one person could be hired when four employees choose 4-days work a week, so that unemployment will be reduced. The lecture says that this is not true always. In fact, companies maybe force their employees work harder to compensate their off day. So not only, don’t the rate of unemployment reduce, but also the employee get less money of their normal pay even with same time of work.
Third, the passage mention that employees can enrich their life quality in the cost of less money. They can spend more time with their family, have more time for getting refresh. The lecture refuse this by talking about the existing of risk in their job in this situation that finally result in have less quality in their life. When someone chooses the 4-days work week, they will get less opportunity for the promotion in their job, and also get involved less in comparison to those who work 5-days a week that maybe make them lose their job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-27 | orchid | 3 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Mrudula | 71 | view |
| 2019-05-25 | Mahbod Abrisham | 3 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Rembrandt's painting 73
- extinction of giant Steller's sea cow 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today. 73
- fine lines seen in Sinosauropteryx's fossil which was preserved in volcanic ash 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most business people are motivated only by the desire for more money. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, so, third, while, in fact, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 314.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75796178344 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20194316318 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474522292994 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3676122833 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.714285714 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134038484874 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561784605857 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552828709151 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102895707555 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255558343968 0.0443174109184 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.