4days workweek
While the passage states that a four day work week with less payment to the employees would work in favor for the company, country and individual employee; the lecture expresses a different point of view.
Firstly, the passage claims that this policy would produce more rested and alert employees who would make less errors. Moreover, it would not cost more money for the company to hire more staff as the employees would take less payment and eventually the company would make more profit as it would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees. However, the lecture states that the policy would make the company spend a lot more as new staffs need to be supported with training and medical facilities. Healthcare for the employees who are working fewer days are same as before. Additionaly, the company would need more office space and computers which would ultimately decrease its profit.
Secondly, the passage claims that the policy would benefit the country by reducing unemployment rate. On contrary, the lecture states that it would not happen that way as it may go for options like over timing or raising expectations from the employees which would make their current job unpleasant.
Finally, the passage argues that <span class="hiddenSpellError" pre="that "></span> individual employees would more personal freedom as a result of reduced work days. The lecture contracts to this by asserting that it would rather reduce their quality of life as their career stability would decrease by lowering the chances of promotion or even losing jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-06-27 | orchid | 3 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | Mrudula | 71 | view |
| 2019-05-25 | Mahbod Abrisham | 3 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-08 | emadifahimeh@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- Dr.Carp, An anthropologist 73
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 58
- The following appeared in a memorandum from a dean at Omega University Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors 73
- Chaveliar memoir 3
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books We recommend that Monarch Books open a caf in its store Monarch having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years has a large customer base because it is 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun errors is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...sted and alert employees who would make less errors. Moreover, it would not cost mor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...would make the company spend a lot more as new staffs need to be supported with tr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 5.04856512141 376% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32669322709 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14178730139 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529880478088 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9125750702 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.7 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.