The charts below show part of the results of an extensive public survey on people’s attitude to a range of issues.
The line graph and the four bar charts show people’s opinions about national budget paid for public transportation and health in relation with education through a survey conducted publicly.
Overall, the majority of people surveyed takes education into a priority in terms of financial investment.
For the first question about financial aid on education, seven in ten, 70%, agree that this is necessary while only one-fifth of people surveyed disagree. In the second question given, there are up to 80% advocators for money invested in public transport and education, as opposed to one in ten people accept.
When asked whether healthcare need a higher quantity of money invested, neutral responders constitutes the same percentage as those saying ‘no’ (30%). The proportion of those approving an increase in tax is prevailing, which is against a mere 5% of people who have no idea about an increase in tax to support the aforementioned services.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-30 | karen0929134 | 61 | view |
- Write about the following topic:Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 84
- The tables give information on the temperatures and the hours of daylight in two particular cities in the same week in May in 2007 68
- Your local council is considering closing a sports and leisure centre that it runs in order to save money Write a letter to the local council In your letter Give details of how you and your friends or family use the centre Explain why the centre is import
- The charts below show part of the results of an extensive public survey on people’s attitude to a range of issues. 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44736842105 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01103119616 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690789473684 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.323527715 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209643639312 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945730183245 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478439322817 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118502791125 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470979681432 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.